Crypto․com CEO Chris Marsalek Accuses Coinmarketcapcom of ‘Arbitrary Lowering’ of Exchange Ratings – Bitcoin News Exchange – News Couple

Crypto․com CEO Chris Marsalek Accuses Coinmarketcapcom of ‘Arbitrary Lowering’ of Exchange Ratings – Bitcoin News Exchange

Crypto․com CEO Kris Marszalek is having trouble with’s exchange volume rankings, according to a tweet he posted on December 25. In his tweet, Marsalek claimed that the popular cryptocurrency aggregation site “arbitrarily lowered” the exchange’s ranking.

Crypto․com CEO Complains About Coinmarketcapcom’s Exchange Ratings

A recent tweet from CEO Kris Marszalek notes that the exchange’s CEO is upset with the web portal. Marszalek claims that exchange volumes are being misreported and that the trading platform’s ranking has been changed to 14th on a whim.

“happy Birthday [the] a team [at] Coinmarketcap who, a week after my response to his poorly worded tweet, lowered our exchange ranking to #14,” Marsalek chirp On the birthday of Christ. “We are 2/3rd on Coingecko, so you know where to look for real, market-neutral data,” added the CEO of the exchange.

According to statistics on, ranked 16th on Sunday. However, Coingecko’s spot exchange metrics indicate that ranks second in terms of trade volume rankings today. The 24-hour trade volume of is $2.8 billion, according to Coingecko statistics. Meanwhile, (CMC) metrics show to have a volume of $1.5 billion, down more than 15%.

After Marsalek’s tweet, a number of people responded to his allegations. Official Baby Doge Team He said They were having a hard time getting CMC to check their BABYDOGE supplies. Coingecko co-founder Bobby Ong thanked Marsalek for his compliment. “Happy birthday Chris,” Ong replied. “Thank you for all the support. Have a happy holiday with your family.”

Several other people who responded to Marsalek’s tweet said that it is well understood that the Binance trading platform owns CMC. “CMC is owned by Binance… I am not surprised,” one person replied To the CEO’s tweet. “[I] Another replied, “Never use CMC since Binance bought it.”

Coinmarketcap․com’s price feed became choppy on December 14

The news comes on the heels of CMC’s issues on December 14, when people were complaining that the site was showing price discrepancies. On that day, the price of Bitcoin (BTC) on CMC was $778 billion per unit and many other coins prices were wrong. The Communications and Media Authority addressed the situation in a tweet regarding price violations, after receiving numerous complaints on social media.

“Following the irregularities we noted on our platform this afternoon,” CMC wrote in response to the complaints.[and] Although the issue is fixed, we will restart our servers as a last step according to our internal repair plan. We apologize for the inconvenience, the portal team books. Later in the day, Cmc joked chirp:

How did it feel to be a trillionaire for a couple [of] hours?

Tags in this story

Binance, Binance CMC, Bitcoin (BTC), Bobby Ong, CMC, CoinGecko, Coinmarketcap Violations,,, CEO of, CEO of, Variations, Exchange Ratings, Chris Marsalek, many complaints, trade volume Twitter

What do you think of executives’ complaints against CMC’s stock exchange ratings? Tell us what you think about it in the comments section below.

Jimmy Redman

Jamie Redman is the head of news at News and a technology financial journalist based in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,000 articles for News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

photo credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikicommons

disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the Company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button